Foreigners in UK
  • Home
  • News
  • Legal News
  • Guides
  • Community
  • Facebook

Home » Stop immigration checks on bank account holders, campaign groups tell UK government

Stop immigration checks on bank account holders, campaign groups tell UK government

29/01/2018

Campaign groups have strongly condemned immigration checks on bank account holders saying they will have harmful and discriminatory consequences.

The Migrants’ Rights Network (MRN), Global Justice Now and No Borders in Banks said they were deeply concerned by the adding of another element to the already pernicious and established ‘hostile environment’ for migrants.

PoundsA new measure recently introduced by the Home Office requires banks and building societies to check on the immigration status of all personal current account holders.

The move is part of the government’s strategy to encourage those in the UK illegally to leave the country.

The checks are being done against the details of known irregular migrants which the Home Office is sharing with Cifas, an anti-fraud organisation.

The Migrants’ Rights Network (MRN), Global Justice Now and No Borders in Banks said the new measures will lead to current accounts being frozen or closed down incorrectly, due to a high error rate in the Home Office data used for the checks.

They’ll also deny vulnerable migrants – already at heightened risk of exploitation due to their immigration status – safe access to their money, and force them to rely on black financial markets and cash.

RELATED ARTICLE: UK banks forced to carry out immigration checks on personal current account holders

The measures will also leave these same migrants unable to meet their most basic needs, such as for food and housing. Accessing such services is a right for everyone, no matter your immigration status, the campaign groups said.

They observed that the account closures will be felt disproportionately by people of Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) backgrounds, given the links between immigration status and ethnicity.

“We are also worried by the lack of clarity around an appeals process for affected individuals. Moreover, given the Home Office’s notorious track record in processing complaints, we fear any process eventually established will be poorly run and lengthy. This will further compound the issues raised above,” the Migrants’ Rights Network (MRN), Global Justice Now and No Borders in Banks said in a joint statement.

The campaign groups said the banking sector itself – including the CEO of RBS and a former board member of TSB – have expressed their concerns about implementing the checks.

“With such clear opposition from all sides, we demand the UK government ends this unethical, harmful and discriminatory policy immediately,” they said.

BAME bank account Global Justice Now Home Office Immigration checks Migrants' Rights Network (MRN) No Borders in Banks
JudgeSolicitor: What to do if Home Office rejects your UK visa application
Meet Eugene Ankomah, an artist with remarkable ability to create exciting and intense artwork

You may also like

Anti-immigration League party gives Italy its first...

Home Office: Over 10,000 vulnerable refugees affected...

London set to host Students Against Racism National...

Diversity

Applications for SOAS Sanctuary Scholarships –...

British asylum process is unjust and a lottery, Home...

What is a non-straightforward UK Visa application?







Trending News

  • Eugene Ankomah – an enigmatic artist using his art...
  • Anti-immigration League party gives Italy its first...
  • Home Office: Over 10,000 vulnerable refugees...
  • Romanian fish stew
    RECIPE: How to prepare Romanian Saffron Fish Stew
  • London set to host Students Against Racism National...




Copyright © 2017. Foreigners in UK

  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
We use cookies to personalise content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyse our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners who may combine it with other information you’ve provided to them or they’ve collected from your use of their services [See details] I agree